Friday, September 10, 2010
Welcome Visitor! | login/logout
 

   


Not realistic
Email Print
To the editor:

In the June 24 Faribault Daily News, Candy Nordine, executive director of the nonprofit Project Sight, blames George W. Bush’s advocacy of abstinence programs for increases in teen pregnancies. Ms. Nordine asserts “… abstinence is not a realistic standard for teenagers.” Oh really!

For over 40 years, liberal sexual theology has been America’s destructive standard for our children.

Have as much sex as you want. The government will take care of you. Don’t worry about STDs. The government will take care of you. Don’t worry about abortions. The government will take care of you. Don’t worry about paying for anything. The government will take care of you. Of course, you will end up totally dependent on government bureaucrats — but hey it will be swell — as the government really cares about you.

So what have families and children gotten for their money?

One stark result is the disastrous impact on black families.

Today 70 percent of black children are illegitimate. In 1940 the rate was only 19 percent.

With the resulting dysfunctional families, it should come as no surprise that in the Minneapolis Public Schools today 40 percent of black children never graduate from high school. On standardized tests, black children score an average of 40 percent where 60 percent is passing.

So liberal sexual theology has created huge numbers of black children who have no future except total dependency on the government.

Ironically, with the reality of their failed plans so obvious, liberals are nonetheless contemptuous of abstinence programs. Their greatest fear appears to be that if abstinence programs proved successful, liberal government bureaucrats and liberal nonprofit organizations would be out of work.

To the point.

A study on abstinence appeared in the “Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine” just this past February (Washington Post — Feb. 2, 2010).

The article is entitled “Efficacy of a Theory-Based Abstinence — Only Intervention Over 24 Months.” The study showed promising results on abstinence.

The conclusion drawn was “Theory-based abstinence-only interventions may have an important role in preventing adolescent sexual involvement.”

Liberal sexual theology is an abject failure — destroying young lives and creating dysfunctional families. Primary responsibility for bringing love and caring and values to our children must be with Mom and Dad — not with the government.

Richard Hansen

Faribault
Share: 

Guidelines: Welcome to the Faribault Daily News community. Please keep your comments civil. Don't attack other readers personally and keep your language decent. If you would like to report abuse click here to notify us.
 
Member Opinions:
By: secretsquirrel on 6/29/10
Can a person make abstinence retroactive?

By: gobush on 6/29/10
Excellent letter Richard. And excellent points made! I don't believe it could be effective all on its own, but abstinence theory and teachings have been found to be productive....and should be continued. It is the liberal sex theories that have been a failure in this nation..dating back to the 60's.

By: gofaribs on 6/29/10
Good point, Dick, kids should only be taught abstinence. They should be expected to resist temptation at every point in time; they should be expected to do WHAT NO CULTURE IN THE HISTORY OF HUMAN BEINGS has managed to do, and remain abstinent until they're physically, financially and emotionally mature enough to have children.

I am not saying abstinence can't be taught, but at least teach safe sex practices too. The dangers of sex are great motivators for kids to stay abstinent but SEX is a great motivator for them not to. Why not be prepared?

By: CantCatchaBreak on 6/29/10
Not too many studies I know fail to show promising results for their cause.

By: dude on 6/29/10
if abstinence doesn't work abortion is still legal

By: gobush on 6/30/10
good point dude!

By: Chris on 6/30/10
The issue that the writer brings up seems less to do with sex, and more to do with responsible parenting. He hangs his hat on the a dubious statistic regarding the percentage of out of wedlock births among African Americans in general, not on actual birthrates or pregnancy rates for teens. In general, teen birthrates have been going down (by nearly a third in the past two decades) in correlation with an increase in sex education that includes compete and accurate information on birth control. The writer then mucks his own arguments up with an unfounded diatribe against those darn liberals. Interestingly, teen birthrates in more conservative religious states in the southern Bible belt actually have higher teen birthrates than those darn secular liberal states in the northeast. Researchers believe this is primarily due to the culture in those Bible belt states discouraging birth control.

Lets face it, teens have been having sex for as long as there have been teenagers, regardless of religion. In past centuries, teens would marry and be considered adults, and by and large, got by. This is no longer possible due to the need for education and a variety of other cultural factors. Over the centuries we have seen the age at which on is considered and adult slowly creep up from the fairly early teens to 18, and then 21, and even 25 if you follow the logic of car insurance companies and neuroscience.

As a rural Jew in the Jordan valley 100 BCE, if, at age 14, I got the neighbor girl pregnant the answer was simply to marry her and work hard in the field and the community/family would provide the support needed to raise the child. Unfortunately for modern man (and woman), we are still the same creatures as those days but we live in a time when that life course is no longer possible, and we are wise to forgo becoming parents until at least our early twenties, if not later. We no longer marry off girls by age 16 via arranged marriages where they become the property of man as was the case in the time of our founding fathers. In my book, this is a change for the better, but it leaves horny teens with only illicit options to do what comes naturally.
What is the modern teen to do? Well, I will have teenage kids one day, and I hope they will forgo sexual intimacy for as long as they can. I will be an irrational overprotective dad, as it the habit of most caring fathers. But, I also hope I recognize that finding birth control pills or condoms tucked away in the sock drawer is a sign of good parenting, as it shows that the child was raised with the same degree of responsibility that I took when I was a teen. The substantial majority of teens will not be a virgin at age 20, as has been the case for time out of mind, so raising a responsible teen means teaching birth control.

By: BeLogical on 7/6/10
Dude says, "if abstinence doesn't work, abortion is still legal" and Gobush thinks that's a good point. Killing a baby a good point! How sick we've become since becoming a contracepting society. Do what feels good and instead of facing the consequences, kill the baby and you know that left alone, it is a baby. As to Chris's point about there being more teen births in conservative, southern states than in those "darn, secular liberal states in the northeast." I would disagree with the researchers and say the Southeners don't kill the babies, but those darn, secular liberals think it's O.K.

 
Login and voice your opinion!  



Video

Photo Galleries

I35 Marketplace Home

Featured Business:
Top Jobs | Top Homes | Top Cars 
There are no current ads for this category